Betting News
Maverick Founder Moves To Save Eight Washington Casinos From Closure
Maverick Gaming founder Eric Persson says he is buying eight Washington cardroom casinos out of his own company's bankruptcy, a deal that could keep around 850 people in work. But the rescue does little to change the conditions that pushed Maverick under in the first place.
SportsBoom offers honest and impartial bookmaker reviews to help you make informed choices. While we may earn commissions through affiliate links, our content remains independent and free from promotional influence. For more information, see our Content Transparency and How We Review pages.

Credit: Getty Images
Eight Washington casinos that were heading for closure on November 30 now look set to stay open, after Persson confirmed he is acquiring the properties from the bankrupt operator he co-founded.
Speaking to KIRO Newsradio, as reported by MyNorthwest[1], Persson said the purchase should close within the next three weeks and that staff would be rehired by the new company.
For regulars, he said, the change of ownership should be invisible.
"From a customer standpoint, you know nothing changes," Persson said, confirming the casinos would remain open.
Which casinos were set to close?
Over the past week, Maverick Washington LLC lodged eight separate Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) filings with Washington's Employment Security Department, each setting a closure date of November 30.
The properties span the state rather than a single region, from Puget Sound to the Tri-Cities and central Washington:
| Casino | Location |
|---|---|
| Chip's Casino | Lakewood |
| Macau Casino | Lakewood |
| Palace Casino | Lakewood |
| Great American Casino | Everett |
| All Star Casino | Silverdale |
| Casino Caribbean | Yakima |
| Crazy Moose Casino | Pasco |
| Coyote Bob's Casino | Kennewick |
Chip's Casino alone accounted for 131 of the jobs at risk, covering table game dealers, cage cashiers and bartenders. Crazy Moose employs 137 people and Coyote Bob's 68, according to World Casino Directory.[2]
Crucially, every filing left the door open. Each carried the same notice from Maverick: "Maverick Washington LLC is currently subject to a bankruptcy proceeding and, as part of that proceeding, there could be a potential change of operator and/or owner for the site."
The notice went on: "If the site is transitioned to a new owner/operator, the above-referenced closure may not occur, or alternatively, the closure could be delayed."
In hindsight, that caveat reads less like boilerplate and more like a signpost. Pasco City Councilman Leo Perales had already told NewsTalk 870 that new ownership was coming for Crazy Moose shortly after the closure letter arrived.[3]
Why is Persson buying back his own casinos?
This is not Persson's first move to retain Washington assets through the bankruptcy process. In September 2025, an entity he manages won a court auction for three Maverick locations in the state with a $28 million bid, according to Bloomberg Law.[4]
The logic of a founder buyout is straightforward. Chapter 11 lets assets move to a new owner without the debts, leases and fixed costs that broke the old structure. A leaner company can run the same rooms, with the same staff, on a cost base the previous owner could never reach.[5]
What Persson has not yet set out publicly is the price, the financing behind the deal, or whether the new company will run all eight sites on the same terms. Those details will matter far more to the long term survival of these rooms than the headline rescue.
How did Maverick end up in bankruptcy?
Maverick filed for Chapter 11 protection in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas on July 14, 2025, listing assets and liabilities each in the $100 million to $500 million range (next.io). At the time it owned 17 Washington cardrooms alongside casinos and hotels in Nevada and Colorado.
Three pressures stand out.
Debt from rapid expansion. Founded in 2017, Maverick grew quickly through acquisitions and sale-leaseback deals. S&P Global Ratings warned in June 2024 that its capital structure was unsustainable, with rent, interest and capex too high relative to expected earnings.
Tribal competition. Washington's tribal casinos pay no state gaming tax and can offer slots, sports betting and higher table limits. Commercial cardrooms are capped at 15 tables and, since 2023, a $400 maximum wager (next.io).
Failed legal and regulatory pushes. Maverick's challenge to tribal exclusivity over sports betting was dismissed by the Ninth Circuit (Yogonet). The company also blamed the Washington Gambling Commission for rejecting a centralized surveillance petition designed to cut cardroom costs.
The result has been a steady contraction. Maverick has closed several Washington sites since April, and two Tukwila properties, Great American Casino and Riverside Casino, are due to shut on November 1 with 238 jobs lost (MyNorthwest). Those two are not part of the buyback Persson described.
What does this mean for the wider industry?
A rescue, not a reset. A new owner can strip out legacy debt, but it cannot change the market these rooms trade in. The tax gap with tribal properties, the 15-table cap and the $400 wager limit all remain. If those conditions sank a well-funded operator, a smaller successor will need to run far leaner to make the numbers work.
Pressure on Olympia. Washington's commercial cardroom sector is shrinking in plain sight. More than 1,000 jobs were in the firing line across Maverick's November closures combined. That gives the industry a sharper case for relief on table limits, tax rates or surveillance rules when lawmakers and regulators next look at the sector.
Sports betting exclusivity stays put. Maverick was the most visible commercial challenger to tribal control of Washington sports betting. With the company carved up and the court route exhausted, that exclusivity looks more secure than at any point since legalization in 2020. Any future change is now far more likely to come through the legislature or tribal compacts than through the courts.
A warning on leveraged roll-ups. Maverick's growth was built on buying regional properties with debt and selling the real estate to lease it back. That model works while revenue grows. When it stalls, rent and interest bills arrive regardless. Other mid-market operators expanding the same way will be watching how this ends.
Founder buybacks as a template. If Persson can reopen these rooms on a cleaner balance sheet, expect more distressed operators to use Chapter 11 sales as a way for insiders or local buyers to keep properties trading, rather than letting them go dark.
What happens next?
The deal still has steps to clear. Any sale out of Chapter 11 needs bankruptcy court approval, and a new operator will need to satisfy the Washington State Gambling Commission before running the rooms.
If Persson's three-week timeline holds, the purchase should complete before the November 30 closure date, and the WARN notices would fall away as the filings themselves anticipated. The Tukwila closures on November 1 appear unaffected, so the net job losses from Maverick's wind-down this autumn are likely to be smaller than feared, but not zero.

Meet Louis Hobbs, our resident sports guru with a knack for all things darts and snooker. His expertise goes beyond the ordinary, offering deep insights that set him apart. Louis also has a strong passion for US sports, particularly basketball and American football.
Comments
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
References
- 1.https://mynorthwest.com/money/8-washington-casinos-to-close/4281776 - 8 Washington casinos set to close, putting 850 people out of work
- 2.worldcasinodirectory - Maverick Plans Eight Washington Casino Closures, 850 Jobs at Risk
- 3.newstalk870 - Pasco’s Crazy Moose Casino Dodges Closure With New Owership?
- 4.bloomberglaw - Maverick Gaming Founder Wins Auction for Bankrupt Card Rooms
- 5.next.io - Casino and cardroom operator Maverick Gaming files for bankruptcy
Related Resources to Betting News
- Is New York’s Polymarket Case the Blueprint for a Wider Prediction Market Crackdown?
- 81% Figure Highlights the Growing Fraud Prevention Challenge for Gambling Operators
- Is Sydney Sweeney's Novig Campaign a Masterstroke or a Misfire?
- How One Bonus-Abuse Network Created $3.2m in Fraud Exposure
- Which US States Have Banned Prediction Markets
- Prediction Markets' 16-Fold Volume Surge Shows Why Sportsbooks Should Be Worried
- DraftKings’ Four-State Prediction Push Reveals Its Bigger US Market Bet
- MLB’s Polymarket Exclusivity Tested as Five Teams Partner With Kalshi
- Which US States are Posting the Biggest Gambling Revenue Gains in 2026
- Colorado Introduces New Betting Protection Law: Which States Will Follow Next?
- New York's Sports Betting Tax Take Jumped $50M After World Cup Results Favoured the Books
- Prediction Markets Gain Sportsbook-Level Legitimacy as Genius Sports Strikes Polymarket and Kalshi Deals
- Could Real-Time Statistics Change How Americans Bet on Sports?
- U.S. Sportsbooks Are Likely to Break Their All-Time Hold Record This Summer
- Has Live Betting Become More Popular Than Pre-Match Betting?
- Why Fast Rewards Drive Online Gambling Growth
- The reason why U.S. Betting Operators are becoming Media Ecosystems
- Are Branded Slot Games Still Effective at Attracting New Players?
- Gamification in Online Casinos: Where Games and Gambling Converge
- Simplicity Over Value: Why Casual Bettors Accept Worse Odds